The Archbishiop Of Canterbury Is A wanker! [UPDATED]
Posted by DeadAnarchistPhil on February 7, 2008
Absolutely unbelievable! Will somebody give the Archbishop of Canterbury a pat on the back followed by a kick up the arse with a steel toe cap boot extremely fucking hard?! What is this man on? I think it’s a good hefty dose of political correctness, religious morality and arse licking! I mean come on! Is the country not bad enough with the flawed laws we’ve already adopted from the Christian model of law… now we want to add the Islamic law to that? Actually in all fairness we already have Jewish law courts operating in the U.K. why not add Sharia law to it? It’ll be great! We can read about and watch Muslims stone other Muslims to death, force women to wear veils etc… Christ on a bike with a dildo up his arse when will these idiots stop?
Why did he even mention it? Oh wait… to make the muslims feel at home. Wake up! Sharia Law is one of the reasons why they fled their original countries in the first place! You all know I aint a fan of religion and I aint writing this out of hate for it but it’s just ludicrous! The Archbishop actually thinks it will make the system better and be good for integration. Who’s integrating for who? It’s us accommodating them… They should be adjusting to our system not the other way around. The law in this country’s already an ass adding another load of nonsense to it wont help! The Archbishop advocates adding some aspects of Islamic Sharia law to, or run along side, our system, i.e divorce, inheritance and child custody. How could Sharia law make the present divorce system any better? The answer is it can’t! It’s just some moralistic religious wanker dabbling in Political Correctness and trying to make things better! Well it aint gonna make things better! In fact he’s opened the door to making things worse!
All you need to change the law is a high-profile figure (The Archbishop of Canterbury), a willing group who want the law, (some Muslims), and a pressure group with the help of the civil liberties brigade and PC brigade and you’ve got it made! Oh wait… I forgot the ‘R’ word.. RACISM! Anybody who disagrees with this group will automatically be branded a racist and member of the BNP! The rest of the population will soon follow such is their stupidity! All the advocators have to do is argue that some forms of Jewish law are allowed in the system so in order of fairness and equality aspects of Islamic Sharia law should be adopted, even if it takes away the rights of Muslim women. Once this is achieved it opens the door to more and more laws being adopted not just from Islam but from other ethnic/minority groups religions and ways of life. And we all know our politicians are completely spineless they will eventually cave in to it so as the ‘R’ word is mentioned so not to be seen as ‘racists’. Gordon Brown has already said this: “there were areas where small concessions had and could be made” but insisted: “Our general position is that Sharia cannot be used as a justification for committing breaches of English law.” I thought he just said it had?
I’m not a fan of our law system but allowing one law for one person and a different for another or adopting another to appease a minority is not going to end well for the country as whole! especially if the far right benefits from it! So thank you Archbishop of Canterbury… you are a true inspiration for PC lovers and wankers everywhere! Then again if he hadn’t had mentioned it some other idiot would’ve done! You wanna taste of that kind of law? And a taste of the BNP in government? Then you got it! You brought it all on yourselves!
UPDATE: Well thanks to The Archbishop of Canterbury’s comments, lack of opposition from anyone but the far-right groups and a complete lack of Political spine, we now have elements of Sharia Law being used in the UK via the Arbitration Act of 1996.I keep hearing: “This doesn’t affect you, why are you bothered?”. I’m bothered because in a modern-day British secular Democracy, Muslim women will be denied Rights under a Sharia Law Court that they would get mandatory under a British Court!
In Islamic Law women are lesser than Men, this includes their side of any story. They receive less money from inheritance just because they’re women, nearly always told to go back to their husbands because divorce is a last option under Sharia law based Arbitration courts. Which means a woman in an abusive relationship will be subjected to the Horror of it even longer, and Male Children will always go to their father at the age of twelve. The whole religion is Male dominated and biased for Men in any case. And if Women agree to be bound by these laws, which I’m sure a lot will through Community, cultural and family pressure, they will lose those rights they have in a British court.
I don’t buy the argument that: “They agree to be bound by it, they do it by choice, they limit their own rights and will respect the court’s ruling”. As I said, they can be forced, shamed of pressured in to it.
It isn’t right in modern-day Britain, that a woman can agree to limit her rights under a court, when she could keep them in a British court. We have no need for pieces of Sharia Law in any court in the UK, we already have a law system, albeit not perfect, but it’s much better than a blatantly biased court that wont give women a fair hearing, just because of the simple fact they’re Women.
It’s wrong and backwards, and anyone that says it’s not is ignorant or ignoring reality and is an idiot who is fostering the limiting of Women’s rights within a modern secular state.
This position is indefendable!
Visit: One Law For All to understand and read more for opposition against these Arbitration tribunals.