I Don't Fear The Chaos!

Questioning Everything and Everyone!

  • Wankers Of The Week Archive
  • For readers outside of Wordpress: Enter your email address to Subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 47 other followers

Archive for the ‘Answers’ Category

Cameron Attacked For Saying Multiculturalism Has Failed In The UK

Posted by DeadAnarchistPhil on February 6, 2011

I don’t always agree with David Cameron and I certainly don’t like the man that much. My personal feelings aside though, I partly agree with what he said the other day about Multiculturalism in the UK. Read Here for a run down.

Watch her for what the PM said:

First of all, I agree with most of what he said. However, I don’t think Multiculturalism has been a complete failure. There’s only been two failures in multiculturalism, and that’s the problem with some Muslim integration in to UK society and suppression of native English/British culture through shame and white guilt.

Everything else is fine, everyone else more or less rubs along together and hold the same ideals and mixes and intermarries with the Native population. East Asians, West Indians, Jews, Indians (Hindu, Christian, Sikh), Africans, Polish the list is endless! Everyone comes here, they hold the same ideals, retaining old cultural traditions while becoming English/British and their children having english/british blood running through their veins!

On the other hand we have Natives who are constantly shamed in to not taking pride in their historical past as well as their culture, whichever way you want to define it. While people are told to make themselves at home from other countries, the natives are asked to accept so many alien cultural ideals and religions, to accept these cultural changes that are happening so fast, while not having one of their own. Whether you think a country needs culture, tradition, Patriotism or not, doesn’t matter, the fact is it is the substance that holds a country and society together in current times, without it, the country will fracture.

Which brings us the other failure in British Multiculturalism, Islam and some Muslims. Obviously, many Muslims integrate well within the UK and become part of the community. When you take a look at Islam itself though, you will see it is made to resist full integration in to the non-Islamic society of a country where any Muslim community is. The Qur’an is written in such a way that stops Islamic culture, tradition and the religion itself from being diluted by other cultural and societal elements, while also staying part of and respecting the Non-Muslim community and culture in which it resides.

Of course, you can say this about certain Jewish sects and Black Nationalists, the difference is, they’re small in number and don’t tend to become violent and radical if they feel alienated or insulted.

You can also say the same for the White Nationalists, I think they can be as much of a danger to the country as Islamists. The thing is, they are tackled at every step they take by many anti-white nationalist groups and also the Police and other Government intelligence organisations.

I’d just like to make the difference at this point because a few people will be getting confused or foaming at the mouth for not making the distinction between Islamists and Muslims in general.

Islamists are a bad problem, on par with White Nationalism and Nazism. They can’t and shouldn’t be accommodated in society. That’s not to say they shouldn’t have the same rights as we do, I’d draw the line at calling for death and harming of people.

Muslims in general, over all they’re not much of a problem, most keep themselves to themselves, but the reality is self-segregation in a country that you should be doing your utmost to integrate in to is not a good thing. Obviously, not every single Muslim is like this, but a fair few actually are, to say they’re not is to ignore reality completely. I think this is the problem as much Islamists are.

Muslims are caught between being British and Muslims and the two sets of systems that go with them (Western and Islamic). Obviously, some see this as a very serious choice to make, and will always take the side of their religion on such choices, after all, it is the word of God, and that stands above any man-made law or system anywhere else in the world (These are Conservative Muslims [These are not automatically Islamists]). Other Muslims see no conflict and remain Muslims while being British, obviously omitting and not following a lot of things in the Religion that would conflict with the way of life here (These are Moderates), similar to the way Christians and Jews omit large parts of their religion because that type of thing wont be accepted in a modern-day secular society.

Many Muslims, from the moderates to Islamists, all have one thing in common, they don’t wont marry outside of their religion, and if they do, they do it at their own risk, as some family members and others can see it as insulting to them and God. Yes, Muslims will marry whites, blacks or any other group you can think of, as long as they’re also a Muslim. It’s that adherence to Religion again, the idea of keeping the religion, Muslim house holds and communities pure and free of cultural contamination and dilution that is also a problem.

Of course, there’s no law saying you have to marry certain people in British society, only in the Qur’an and some other religions and cultures, but in the UK we have no rules like that anymore, and as such people see fit to marry who they like, unless you accept an arranged marriage. White and Black nationalists also take advantage of this freedom and use it to keep themselves ‘Pure’ too, but in a ‘racial’ sense and not a religious one. Either way, racial or religious, you can see how that kind of attitude is detrimental and damaging to a country and the communities within it. Unwillingness to integrate and mix on a social, community and even a racial level is going to damage society, I don’t care what type of Muslim or Nationalist you are, it doesn’t help. However, as I said before, it isn’t a law in the UK so people will please themselves.

I’d just like to say, I am not lumping all Muslims in with Nationalists, I was just explaining what other groups have the same kind of attitude/policy on marriage and can have an effect on the community they live in.  

All the above is the reason why Muslims were singled out in this speech by the PM. It wasn’t a witch hunt, it wasn’t misguided opinions based on a distorted media image, it was based on reality. Some Muslims in the UK today are turning radical, and it’s because of their religion and Western actions in Muslim countries. The fear of speaking out on issues such as this has also helped things along, because no one can have an opinion on such issues without being called a racist or Islamophobic because Muslims and Liberals are so sensitive about it, which resulted in a blanket ban on talking about anything Muslim, unless a Muslim was saying it. This ban on not talking about Islam and being forced to respect it, every part of it, even when elements of Islam are/were at odds with our own law and ideals, only gave ammunition to far right groups.

Those far right groups have only grown and continued to exist partly as a result of fast constant immigration, cultural change and sensitivity of Muslims and others regarding their religion and culture. That atmosphere created by that ‘keep your mouth shut, don’t offend anyone’ Politically Correct policy is what nourishes the far right, what annoys the average person and ultimately leads to the friction we have.

This sensitivity can be seen even now, look at the reaction from Muslim groups in the UK in the above video. They basically say: “We’re being victimized.” That isn’t the case, they’re being called out on a legitimate problem that exists within the Muslim community, one serious enough to make the British Government question it’s policy of Multiculturalism and even the funding some Muslim charities get. Muslim groups just don’t like anyone having a view of them that isn’t sanctioned by them,  positive and displays them in a good light. It’s simple, they just don’t like criticism, and any radicalisation is someone else’s fault and not their’s or their religion’s. In my opinion I’d lay a fair bit of the blame at the religion’s door, it’s so restrictive, controlling and out-of-step with British society that the only way you can be a British Muslim in the UK is by ignoring a lot of what the Qur’an and Hadith say.

The fact one Muslim group mentioned Cameron and the English Defence League (EDL) being on the same page really annoyed me. Here is someone talking about a legitimate problem, in a nice way, and they stand up and say: “You should write for the EDL”. It’s because of that attitude and the defence of it by people on the left, center and right that’s lead to the EDL, and Cameron and other European leaders having to say what they do and call Moderate Islamic groups out on their problems. If they didn’t, where would the population turn? It would turn to less savory groups like the British National Party.

The time of hiding behind the cultural and religious sensitivity card has to come to an end, the Moderate Muslims can’t keep blaming Western society, ignorance and Western wars in Muslim countries for the problems Muslim communities in the West have. It’s a combination of their own Religion’s and culture’s conservative inflexibility in the face of a Secular Western state as well as the religion’s allowance to accommodate violence and propagate hatred.

Posted in Answers, News and politics | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , | 21 Comments »

Help Me Out?

Posted by DeadAnarchistPhil on December 12, 2010

There’s no Wanker Of The Week today, I thought I’d do something light before I post my long serious blog tomorrow.

When I was a kid, about the mid to late 1980’s we were given a Betamax video system by a neighbour. It was around the time Sony was getting it’s arse kicked in the UK Video System market by VHS systems. So, we being poor, accepted the offer of a free Video System, be it outmoded or not! 

With the System we got some tapes too. I can’t remember what adult pieces were on there, I’m not even sure we got any adult videos (I’m not talking about porn here btw), I only remember having cartoons. We had a few Warner Bros cartoons on there, I think they were anyway. But the one I liked the most was about a scentist or chemist who travled through his bottles. I’m not sure if he fell asleep and dreamed it or he actually shrank himself or someone did it to him. I think skeletons were dancing as well as he was boiled and pushed through his many glass implaments.

Sounds like a bad dream doesn’t it? But it wasn’t it was funny and meant to be a little bit scary but interesting for the children as well as adults. From the animation it looked like it could’ve been from the late ’40s to the early ’60s, most likely American, though I could be completely wrong.

I think it’s name was ‘Bottles’, though I could be completely wrong with that too! I’ve been trying to find this animation since I got on-line back in 2006! The last time I saw it was 1996, I think, it was on the BBC at Christmas time, I think. I know, there’s a lot of “I think!”‘s in this post, but it was so long ago! If anyone has any idea what it is or if they’ve seen anything like it, or even if you know of a site where I can maybe try and find it, then let me know! I’ve already searched Youtube but I couldn’t find it, also searched Wikipedia with no joy. So, let us know if you have any idea!

                                                                           Daf found it! Three cheers for Daffers!

Posted in Answers | Tagged: , , , , , , | 8 Comments »

You’re a Dickhead! No… You’re a Dickhead! Nah, You’re a Dickhead!

Posted by DeadAnarchistPhil on November 24, 2010

Time for another Retro blog from Myspace! This time about the childish stupidity that does/did run rampant on there. I was on there yesterday and apparently the drama is still going on. I’m glad I’m deleting it! 

Orgininaly posted on: 15th Jan 2010


Is it just me or does everyone else think the top bloggers [on MySpace] are a bunch of idiots? This is something you no doubt already know, just thought I’d blog on it because I was amazed and amused by what I read on there. 

I don’t – or at at least I try not to – get involved with slagging matches on the net because that just distracts from the blog subject at hand. You just come across as a cunt and look like you have no argument at all. For this reason I very rarely visit the top bloggers, and it’s even more rare I comment them. So many sad people, so many fake profiles to start drama in their own comment box, there’s more sense in a bucket of shit!

I learned very soon after joing Myspace that commenting on the top bloggers is a little pointless, even if you comment the so called enlightened Liberals or Lefties. These people have a pack mentality and habit of jumping on anyone who disagrees slightly with their group of cyber friend’s opinions/ideology and then insult you. It’s like the mentality of communities in Rawanda who killed their own neighbours. Even though they know it’s wrong they can’t help themselves so they have to protect their cyber tribe and Leftest, Neocon or Liberal dogma by creating a nice little piece of Cyber Rawandan attack in a Myspace comment box!

I have a few cyber friends who blog, they blog and debate alot but I never feel the need to leap to their defence in the middle of a debate they’re having! They’re quite capable of defending themselves and arguing their own point without me swooping on there and saying: “Yeh but actually, you’re thick and X, Y and Z” *Posts a picture featuring the word “FAIL”*.

These people are a Government’s wet dream! They fancy themselves as Political bloggers but spend more time arguing amongest themselves and plagiarising articles from the main stream media! What more could a Government want? One lot of idiots regurgitating what they put out, and the other lot thinking they’re smarter than the first lot and calling them idiots while the rest argue amongst themselves! Great, No one’s paying attention to what the Government is actually doing, which is what these people were supposed to be doing in the first place! Instead they’re insulting each other and treating it like a sports game!

What a bunch of sad tossers! Fake profiles, creating drama, name calling, blog arguing, Plagiarism… The Myspace political top blog section really is a micro version of the real world with idiots pumping out shit that’s either a lie, rubbish or completely irrelevant to the Political situation at all! These people really are sheep of the worse kind, they’re not aware of what they’re doing or they only care about readership and comments so they manufacture drama. Who and what does that remind you of? 

The top bloggers are sheep, so are the people that follow them. That’s if they’re reading it for it’s news or intellectuall content and not a laugh. No matter where you go the sheep will always be on top, just like the pond scum.

To find something of more substance and less shallow, you have to go a little deeper! You have to find people that wont agree with everything you say, that will challenge your opinions, people that think outside the box and who’re open to new ideas instead of living in an ideologcial box created by society and the powers that be.

Posted in Answers, Go Fuck Yourself!, My MySpace Retro Blogs | Tagged: , , | 9 Comments »

Mondern Capitalism, Consumerism And The Quality Of A Product

Posted by DeadAnarchistPhil on August 28, 2009

I aint been around for five or six days, you probably didn’t notice because I’m always disappearing for months on end! haha. I’ve been letting my back rest while the router/modem at our place decided it was faulty. So my back is feeling much better after a rest and now the net is back I can blog a little!

My Vlogging idea hasn’t got off the ground yet because my PC cam’s quality has degraded so much! You want quality you have to pay through the nose for it! It’s obvious these Companies could mass produce a quality camera that will last a long time for a reasonable price. But no, the law of modern Capitalism says otherwise, especially where electronics are concerned. You buy a modern electronic device and it’s out of date in six months, the same can be said for operating systems for Personal Computers too.

When you buy expensive PC Cams they usually degrade or break after two years or so and also will most likely not work on any new Windows or Mac Operating Systems because they don’t support the hardware or software anymore. Yes the manufactures of the cams do updates but eventually they want it to stop working so you go out and buy a new one! So eventually they stop supporting it, this little rule of business applies to Operating Systems too. For example, Windows XP, it’s Microsoft’s best OS for some time and people like it, when Microsoft brought out Windows Vista people’s reactions to the new OS was luke warm at best. So what do Microsoft do?… they stop supporting XP so you’ll have to up-grade to some kind of Vista OS.

I know these companies have to stay in business and want people to buy their new devices and offerings, but not at the expense of the publics pockets. These companies not only want you to buy their goods but are telling you what you want by forcing this stuff on you! I thought market forces decided what we get, not the producers who supply us? We want X, Y and Z but they supply A, B and C because they think it’s what we want, and when we don’t want it they force it on us. In a Computer software industry where there’s only one user-friendly Operating System with the rest a little complicated it leaves you a little strapped for choice so you have to choose what Microsoft offer. The same can be said for the hardware and other electronic devices, they make it built not to last because it’s the nature of the business and make you pay through the nose for it when it aint quality!

You could say it’s the nature of the electronic industry, but I’ve observed the same kind of trend in the clothing, furniture and even housing industries! Clothes for example, you can have the same pants made in the same place, some then have a designer label sewn on them, the others don’t. One person pays £30 quid for a pair with the label on, the other pays £5 quid for a pair with no label on it. They’re both the same article and wear-out at the same time if worn the same amount of times. Another instance, a bed, my grandmother bought a light-weight Iron bed back in 1930s for a good price, maybe earlier, and it lasted ’till 1996! It was her Brother’s while he was at home, then was used for one of her own sons then her grandchildren! How many beds these days last that long? How much furniture at all last over 5 years these days?

The idea of you get what you pay for is very seldom the case these days, nothing is built or made to last because you don’t make more money that way, it would put some businesses out of business and lose profits for some, and God forbid that should happen! Ever since the end of World War Two the principle you get what you pay for has melted away and been replaced by ‘CONSUME! CONSUME! CONSUME!’ of shoddy rubbish under the pretence that it’s quality to increase profits.

So it looks like I’ll be making audio of my blogs instead of videos, I’ll have to put some pictures on there to illustrate what I’m saying. Should be good!

Posted in Answers, Computers and Internet, Hobbies, News and politics | Tagged: , , , , , | 4 Comments »

A Plausible Exit Strategy From Iraq And Why The Coalition wont take it.

Posted by DeadAnarchistPhil on August 18, 2007

                                                  The Exit Strategy
Following all the car bombings, suicide bombs and all the other general resistance activity the coalition forces in Iraq has endured since the 2003 invasion I thought it was time I should offer up some kind of solution as I usually do and then let people ignore it.
Firstly lets look at why the coalition forces are hated so much. I think the majority do not feel that strongly towards the forces, they are protection and another target for a bullet from a religious extremist as far as they’re concerned as it’s one less for them… especially for the minorities. If the population is upset it’s because of the lack of advancement and progress in the country. Then there’s the religious extremists who stir up all the shit and make the population feel like they are betraying their God and country by not doing anything (Don’t ask me why it works and people listen, ideology just brings out the stupidity in people and undermines logical thinking!). Can I also just say at this point that whenever the extremists set things back by a roadside bomb or insurgents targeting oil pipe lines, the population blame the coalition instead of blaming themselves and the extremists for doing it or letting it happen! Anyway… back on topic… There’s also the fact that the troops there are Christians and Muslims don’t like that!
Here’s what I propose, with all of the above reasons and more we need to get out of Iraq. The population is hostile towards the troops because they are Christians and in their minds, because of the extremist and their shite religion telling them they are invaders! So, what to do? Take out nearly all the coalition troops leaving only a small force. Then we get the UN to invite muslim nations of the UN to send their troops there to patrol, secure and teach the authorities what they need to know till the insurgents have been dealt with or disbursed. My thinking behind putting only muslim troops in is because the population will not feel as strongly towards them because they are their fellow muslim “Brothers and Sisters”. Why they don’t mind foreign muslims who speak a different language beats me. In fact why the muslim world let Saddam go around killing his own people for so long by gassing and other methods gets me too! He even used to kill people he didn’t like by putting them in to a shredder head first… if they were lucky! Where were the insurgents with their roadside bombs then? It’s all ok when a fellow muslim blows a muslim away but when it’s a Christian, Jew or some other non-Muslim it’s all different? The answer is their religion. If there’s any young people reading this don’t do religion kids… it’ll fuck you up worse than drugs!
Anyway… so with only their fellow “Brothers” to blow away it should calm down. Then again they’ll probably start blowing each other away because of religious sectarianism within the population.                                                                 
                                                                The Reason It Wont Happen
I think it’s obvious now that the war in Iraq, lead predominantly by the US and UK, is just not working and hasn’t worked from day one! The whole point of “Operation Iraqi Freedom” HA!! Was to remove Saddam Hussein from power and to, by the US’s and UK’s extremely wrong, flawed and most likely fabricated intelligence, get rid of his weapons of mass destruction. That was the official line anyway, we all know the real reason was to assure the United State’s petrodollar survival by taking Iraq’s oil reserves, which are the second largest in the world! Let me explain a little what a “Petrodollar” is, I got this from a site…
The strength of the dollar since 1945 rests on being the international reserve currency for global oil transactions (i.e., “petro-dollar”). The U.S. prints hundreds of billions of these fiat (Fiat = “money that is made legal tender by the decree, or fiat, of the government but that is not covered by a specie reserve”) petro-dollars, which are then used by nation states to purchase oil and energy from OPEC producers. These petro-dollars are then re-cycled from OPEC back into the U.S. via Treasury Bills or other dollar-denominated assets such as U.S. stocks, real estate, etc. The recycling of petro-dollars is the price the U.S. has extracted since 1973 from oil-producing countries for U.S. tolerance of the oil-exporting cartel.
So basically the US can print as much money as it wants because its currency is used by everyone to buy everything… especially Oil! So back in November 6th 2000 when Iraq switched from selling its oil in dollars to Euros it set alarm bells ringing in Washington! They thought that if Iraq switched to selling its oil in Euros that maybe then OPEC would? What if the Saudis had enough of the US or were taken over by a new Government of extremists? The US would have nowhere to go would it? If OPEC then decided to sell in Euros the US economy, as would nearly all connected economies, would collapse if it was switched all at once! This would be the ultimate attack and would destroy the US! And I have no doubt that some people in OPEC would do this for spite amongst other reasons! Ultimately it’s not in OPEC’s best interests to destroy its own market, that would just be stupid. But a gradual transition over to the Euro would push the US out of the picture and make it a bit player thus ending it’s dominance in the world. So to stop this nightmare from even starting the US and UK whipped up a storm and some poorly put together and old UN resolution, intelligence and used it to justify an invasion of Iraq under the false pretense of liberating the people from Saddam. When the coalition took power they switched the sale of oil back in to dollars thus assuring the US’s dominance… as long as it holds on to Iraq via military force or by puppet/friendly Government. 
This little story also shows why the European Union, especially France and Germany, didn’t want the invasion to happen, they had everything to lose. Firstly they already had contracts with Iraq as regards to oil, secondly they had the Iraqis buying and selling oil in Euros, thirdly they had their probable future on the line as regards to their currency. So all this nonsense about France, Germany, and other EU and non EU countries like Russia, China etc and all the rest who opposed the invasion being on the side of sense and reason is a load of bollocks! They would have joined at the drop of hat if they knew they would get a piece of the money and action out of it! They’re all just bent, greedy, selfish fucking murderers!
So there you go… it’s better than all the other ideas that the US and UK have thrown at the situation. It wouldn’t end all the violence that’s just stupid to think that… but it’s a start! And if you still think the forces went there to “Liberate” Iraq and it’s people… well… you’re a fucking stupid moronic brainless tit that needs garroting with cheesewire! If you’re that stupid and thick you deserve to die.

Posted in Answers, News and politics | Tagged: , , , , , | 11 Comments »

End The Torture and Vicious Cycle

Posted by DeadAnarchistPhil on December 25, 2006

                                                        The Reasons
The reasons I chose to write about this subject is in response to people I have spoken to for some time now on the subject of not letting certain people have children. I have observed in the world around me, a concern for the children and people in question. You must have seen the NSPCC adverts asking for money and help to stop the abuse of children? And how after they have seen it the people say “They shouldn’t be allowed to have children!”
The same goes for drug addicts or people with addictive personalities and people with extremely low IQ’s, some people say they shouldn’t be allowed to have children either, and I agree. Why I hear you ask? Subjecting a child or condemning it to a life of abuse by the addict parent or being an addict for the rest of their life, would cause untold misery and torture for the addict, the addicts family and the community on the whole. And when I say addict, I mean addicted to all kinds of addictive substances from alcohol to heroin. There are two kinds of addict, there are the ones who drink or take drugs as a habit (habitual addicts) or to cope. Then there is the genetic addict, who is genetically predisposed to be an addict. The genetically predisposed addict is the addict I propose to make infertile and ban from having children. As for the habitual addict who is not genetically predisposed to be an addict can have children under certain strict conditions. Which will be out-lined later.
People with low IQ’s bellow 75 should not be permitted to have children. 75-80 percent of mental retardation runs in the family, and 20-25 percent is due to biological problems and brain damage. As a IQ of 70 or under is considered mentally retarded I suggest IQ, mental health evaluations and social skills evaluations for everyone through out the person’s life. Then once a person reaches sexual maturity and has been found to be unfit to be a parent they will be permanently banned from having children. By either the vasectomy that should have been carried out when the child was of teenage age or carry one out immediately. I also think as soon as a down syndrome child is detected in the womb at the earliest stage it should be mandatory to abort them. As I think it is not fair to bring a child in to a life of mental retardation needing constant care and being a constant burden on the parents, even if they wish to look after it or not. After all it’s the child who will suffer most not the parent, and to bring it in to the world just because they think it’s right or their religion says to do it, is selfish!
Other reasons for not allowing People with low IQ’s to have children, is their inability to look after themselves their children and the environment around them. One instance of this was in my local paper last year. A women with an extremely low IQ was in a relationship with a violent man, she also had a child too, to another previous partner. The child lived with her and her violent partner, the violent partner beat the child on numerous occasions with no real objections from the mother. The child later died. And this women is still allowed to have children, why should she have been allowed to have them in the first place?! The same goes for animals and the places where these people live. It would cause misery on whatever estate they live on as they will not look after the children leading to anti-social behaviour subsequently bringing the estate down and leading to later anti-social generations. It would also lead to neglected animals in their possession.
                                     What should be done and how to do it
First: Sterilize all people with the addictive personalities genes, no matter how old, young, healthy religious, all colours no matter how high their IQ is or even if they are reformed addicts. After all there is always the possibility they could relapse or pass on the genes to the next generation, no matter what their intentions are.
Second: All male children at the age of producing valid sperm for fertilisation, will deposit it in a sperm bank. Once that it is done they will immediately or later have a vasectomy, so as not to go round impregnating all the women, who by the way are not sterilised. Also if the law comes in to force all men who have never been sterilised shall deposit their sperm in a sperm bank too, and then be made in fertile.
Third: As soon as a child is born they have their development monitored, a little like today. So all through life they are monitored in the areas that matter for raising children. For example, the monitoring of temperament and violent tendencies, pedophile tendencies, severe drug abuse or alcohol abuse, IQ and coping skills.
Fourth:,Once the person reaches the age allowing them to have children, around 27, allowing for any violent traits or severe substance abuse, pedophile tendencies, criminal tendencies time to manifest themselves. If the people in question pass the above outlined tests they will be allowed to have children, the amount they have will depend on what the population of the particular country is at the time. Also the male can only have children under strict guidelines, and he will not have possession of the sperm to have the children. And once he’s had the amount of children he is permitted, he can have no more, the same goes for the female. 
                                                 The ethical argument
We live in a so-called democracy, I would call it a shadow democracy but that’s a different story. So I will call it a so-called democracy, but is it ethical to do what I outlined above? Is it right to take away the rights of a person to stop the misery of another they would bring in to the world? I would say yes, but then you have the argument that if you give a government power to take away the right to have children, you give them power to do almost anything! In an ideal world we could implement it, but if this was an ideal world we wouldn’t have a problem in the first place.
The fact remains, we do have a problem and it is not just going to go away. You can train an army of social workers and plow all the money you like in to helping these people, but the core fact is the government has been working on the problem for sometime and there is still problems. I’m not saying things haven’t got better, they have, but there is always a sad story in the paper or on the telly and even in your street, the chances are you will probably know someone with a problem highlighted in the above.
The problem of putting this in to law is if we can trust the government not to take other rights away? With the west’s latest bogy man and excuse to limit our freedoms more, Terrorism!, can we trust them? I can only say I can trust myself, as I could not be bought, bent or corrupted in any way shape or form, and I can guarantee that! The government cannot! So I don’t know if we should sacrifice our right to choose when and if we are allowed to have children? You could say if you follow the above guidelines you will be ok and be allowed to have children if not guaranteed some if you follow them.
Even if I could control the country and make the laws, would doctors perform the operations? Especially religious ones? Even the non religious doctors would have to refuse because it’s against the patients will! It could even cause a deep division in the country it’s self! But lets ask ourselves, what’s the alternative? To let this carry on? People and children subjected to the misery of alcoholism! addicts and people with low IQ’s having children and continuing the circle of substance and violent abuse! And the weakening of the Human species itself?
What do you think? Do you disagree? Do you have other ideas or solutions? let me know.

Posted in Answers, Health and wellness, Questions | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | 25 Comments »

Farepak Collapse/Go on call me evil

Posted by DeadAnarchistPhil on November 22, 2006

          Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting                                                      THE FAREPAK FUCKER!

Yes this it the man who has spoiled Christmas for nearly a million families, his name? Sir Piggy Banking “it wasn’t my fault it was the banks” Clive bent swindling basted Thompson!

How did he do it? Well, He  and the rest of the Farepak company board spent millions of the company’s money and hard-working class people’s money too, on loaning it to other parts of the company. How much? £17million pounds! What for? To pay off it’s parent company’s overdraft of £35million, caused by buying a company for £32million which later sold for £4million! Sir shit bag Thompson blamed the banks for it, the reason? They wouldn’t keep loaning them money and not getting a return! Why the fuck should they! 

All this was known back in August but no one raised the alarm, Why didn’t the directors of the company or business watchdogs say something, why let families keep paying money in to the fund? The answer is the financial services authority doesn’t give a shit about poor working class people’s money and companies like Farepak, it aint important enough to em! Doesn’t come under their regulatory umbrella. Big city bankers, yeah straight in there! If you are gonna keep a eye on fat-cating, keep an eye on all of them!

The Answer! The fat-cats that ruin companies and the people who lose money and some times their lively hoods, should pay for it! How? By takin’ it out of their pockets and bank accounts! It’s not as if they are short of a quid or two. For example, Sir ‘lieing pissflap’ Thompson has worked for numerous companies. 

I will name a couple:

He was the Chairman of Kleeneze, he has held Executive positions at Cadbury, Schweppes, Boots, Sheel and the Deputy Chairman of the Financial reporting council. He has also been the President and deputy President of the confederation of British Industry and may I add he must have a pension at every one of em! He also has the money he was paid from each one too!.

At Farepak he was paid £100,000 a year for a three day week! And a big fat pension to go with it! His partner in crime fellow Director immensely fuckin’ loaded Gilodi Johnson should also pay!. It doesn’t end there, there are more directors that are immensely rich who should pay too! So here is what I propose anyone proved to have run the company wrongly should first be sacked if they already haven’t and fined vast amounts of money and give it to the people who have lost their jobs or investments in the company.

They should never be allowed to work at the helm of a business again! So the compensation and debt repayment comes straight out of their pockets which will deter any fat-cat money grabin’ basterd from doing it again, in any company be it financial business or governmental, but as we know the people of Britain will let it happen and another lot of bastards who have spoiled Christmas for millions of people will get off free AGAIN! Just like at potters bar and all the other institutions where people have been screwed out of their money, lively hoods and even their loved ones!  

                                                                       Go on call me evil!

The British tax payer does it again!. I read in the daily mirror this week that the child murderer Ian “i love kids, really!” Huntley is havin’ a ball in prison. The child murderer apparently has his own body-guard that he pays, has a Sky TV package his own pool cue, we all know what we’d like to do with that! And get this… a Teleytubby duvet and curtains. The increasingly child like murderin’ bastard even has his own play station and piles of doodling colouring books. He also openly boasts of the murders he committed and of his apparent gay sex in the showers and reckons he’s set for life! I don’t know about you but that got my goat! Doesn’t matter if it’s true or not, he’s still wasting tax payer’s money and he’s still breathing.

So here is what I propose: If you can prove beyond the shadow of a doubt that the person in question committed a severe violent attack or sexual attack and will do it again or a murder on purpose and I don’t mean in self-defence like if some one breaks in to your house, “kill them!” Yes it sounds bad but you aint heard the rest of it, before they are killed take every harvestable piece of their body we can!

The reason?

For a start it costs a lot of money, second they will never be able to integrate fully in to society again, third, they are murderers child molesters and worse! So! Why not kill three birds with one stone?    

(1) Save tax payers money.

(2) Get rid of the worst of the worst, and free up space for people who may actually be able to reintegrate in to society.

(3) If we harvest their organs and limbs the waiting list for heart transplants, liver, lungs and so on would be cut somewhat. So if by killing a murderer or violent paedophile saves just one innocent life it’s all worth it! After all they have taken a life, why not end their life to save another?

Leve comments please, what do you think?                                                                                                                                                                                                                     

Posted in Answers, News and politics | Tagged: , , , , , , | 11 Comments »